local differential privacy
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Leiden (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- South America > Uruguay > Maldonado > Maldonado (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado > El Paso County > Colorado Springs (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > France > Île-de-France > Paris > Paris (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia > Arlington County > Arlington (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (0.68)
Generalized Linear Bandits with Local Differential Privacy
Contextual bandit algorithms are useful in personalized online decision-making. However, many applications such as personalized medicine and online advertising require the utilization of individual-specific information for effective learning, while user's data should remain private from the server due to privacy concerns.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (0.62)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.57)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining > Big Data (0.40)
Local Differential Privacy for Regret Minimization in Reinforcement Learning
Reinforcement learning algorithms are widely used in domains where it is desirable to provide a personalized service. In these domains it is common that user data contains sensitive information that needs to be protected from third parties. Motivated by this, we study privacy in the context of finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) by requiring information to be obfuscated on the user side. We formulate this notion of privacy for RL by leveraging the local differential privacy (LDP) framework. We establish a lower bound for regret minimization in finite-horizon MDPs with LDP guarantees which shows that guaranteeing privacy has a multiplicative effect on the regret. This result shows that while LDP is an appealing notion of privacy, it makes the learning problem significantly more complex. Finally, we present an optimistic algorithm that simultaneously satisfies $\varepsilon$-LDP requirements, and achieves $\sqrt{K}/\varepsilon$ regret in any finite-horizon MDP after $K$ episodes, matching the lower bound dependency on the number of episodes $K$.
Prediction with Expert Advice under Local Differential Privacy
We study the classic problem of prediction with expert advice under the constraint of local differential privacy (LDP). In this context, we first show that a classical algorithm naturally satisfies LDP and then design two new algorithms that improve it: RW-AdaBatch and RW-Meta. For RW-AdaBatch, we exploit the limited-switching behavior induced by LDP to provide a novel form of privacy amplification that grows stronger on easier data, analogous to the shuffle model in offline learning. Drawing on the theory of random walks, we prove that this improvement carries essentially no utility cost. For RW-Meta, we develop a general method for privately selecting between experts that are themselves non-trivial learning algorithms, and we show that in the context of LDP this carries no extra privacy cost. In contrast, prior work has only considered data-independent experts. We also derive formal regret bounds that scale inversely with the degree of independence between experts. Our analysis is supplemented by evaluation on real-world data reported by hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic; RW-Meta outperforms both the classical baseline and a state-of-the-art \textit{central} DP algorithm by 1.5-3$\times$ on the task of predicting which hospital will report the highest density of COVID patients each week.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Mexico (0.04)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- (4 more...)
Topological Federated Clustering via Gravitational Potential Fields under Local Differential Privacy
Long, Yunbo, Zhang, Jiaquan, Chen, Xi, Brintrup, Alexandra
Clustering non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data under local differential privacy (LDP) in federated settings presents a critical challenge: preserving privacy while maintaining accuracy without iterative communication. Existing one-shot methods rely on unstable pairwise centroid distances or neighborhood rankings, degrading severely under strong LDP noise and data heterogeneity. We present Gravitational Federated Clustering (GFC), a novel approach to privacy-preserving federated clustering that overcomes the limitations of distance-based methods under varying LDP. Addressing the critical challenge of clustering non-IID data with diverse privacy guarantees, GFC transforms privatized client centroids into a global gravitational potential field where true cluster centers emerge as topologically persistent singularities. Our framework introduces two key innovations: (1) a client-side compactness-aware perturbation mechanism that encodes local cluster geometry as "mass" values, and (2) a server-side topological aggregation phase that extracts stable centroids through persistent homology analysis of the potential field's superlevel sets. Theoretically, we establish a closed-form bound between the privacy budget $ε$ and centroid estimation error, proving the potential field's Lipschitz smoothing properties exponentially suppress noise in high-density regions. Empirically, GFC outperforms state-of-the-art methods on ten benchmarks, especially under strong LDP constraints ($ε< 1$), while maintaining comparable performance at lower privacy budgets. By reformulating federated clustering as a topological persistence problem in a synthetic physics-inspired space, GFC achieves unprecedented privacy-accuracy trade-offs without iterative communication, providing a new perspective for privacy-preserving distributed learning.
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report > Promising Solution (0.68)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Research Report (1.00)
- Summary/Review (0.68)